We just keep arguing and time keeps going. Maybe the argument itself is a strategy that favors the selected few. This tech won't work, it has many flaws, we should continue holding onto the the old systems. Does the old system not have it own flaws too? What am I saying, has the old system not been working?, has it not been helpful? Of course it has. We have seen it play a huge part in driving the economy when it needs were at peak. Created jobs, opportunities, platforms and the other likes but there have been a massive limitation in it.
As we continue to dig deeper into the realm of technology we've come to discover that the system is just favoring a few group of persons. And yes, there is a need for a better adoption, is that not what tech is known for, advancement? So why try to stud it now?. Oh I see, wealth will be transferred or should I say 'properly distributed'. I saw an update yesterday that reveals the United States government hold more than $14 billion worth of Bitcoin. I thought it was volatile, unregulated and the other blah blah blah?.
The SEC keeps of pursuing the platforms and communities giving light to this new tech. I just heard that the man in the long rain coat is at the Uniswap door. Could this be a strategy to accumulate this virtual assets for the governments? You know fines always follows. We are leaving in a world were those in control sleep every night with the fear of not wanting to loose this control. How unsafe they sense they would be so they prefer to keep the economy and several other sectors outdated as long as they stay in control.
source
Have you ever asked yourself, what if blockchain tech, cryptocurrency and web3 were a better means for those in control to exert more authority, would they have pended it massive adoption this far? Would they have criticized the system?. I am no enemy of web2 and centralization if they were properly leveraged but no, we are humans here, greed has taken a huge hold on us. You can't ascertain fairness in this systems. life is not fair, it's a story and a quote I have heard many times and whether I choose to accept it or not, what bothers me most is that the level of unfairness is hyper. Can decentralization corrects all this? Absolutely not, but it will help mitigate this unfairness at least to bearable standards.
We claim to be advanced yet system enjoys staying outdated ( if it actually does, maybe people in the system). What actually is the way forward from here. A technology that is capable of alleviating poverty by creating opportunities is at our door post but critics seems to be a shield. Have we imagine what blockchain tech would have done by now if it was properly introduced into several human sectors. Or is it actually that we don't what things to work well?.
We are seeing the economy becoming more and more inconveniencing. fiat currency is no longer serving it standards. The inflation level has gone wild. People are just working to survive; no savings, no tangible investment ( or even none at all). From my views, cross-border businessing would have serve a huge opportunity through crypto and blockchain tech. We've heard about tokenization of real world assets. Concentrating much effort on this would be capable to promote broader investment, linking entrepreneurs to investors through a transparent platform. The issue of undercapitalization when it comes to raising business continues to limit the developing and underdeveloped countries the more.
source
I feel this our current century has not lived to its technological standards because if it does, it would have realized the opportunities centering it which can promote a better human standard of living. Even the social media sectors have shown flaws from the web2 views. Users should be entitled for more. Time is money yet few control others like robots to make the entire money. The creators of the platforms keeps milking the benefit and leaving the hard work for the users. Truth be told, if web2 and web3 were to be kept at a flat table with a user properly enlightened, without doubt, the later would have been his clear choice.
The limitation of web3, blockchain and decentralization is not basically because it came late but rather, a force is fighting against its massive adoption. This anti-force prefer us to stay outdated as long as they keep staying in both profit and control. It's no easy task to get power out from the hands of those who have used and benefited from it. As I said, we are humans, even if it comes at the discomfort of others, many will always give blind eyes and deaf ears.
To conclude, let me add, if the world at this current technological state cannot fight the insufficiencies that we are facing globally, then we have chosen to stay outdated. Measures have been introduced, advanced tech have surface but it has been ignored at the cost of 'assumed incompatibility'. No tech will ever be compatible, the old systems are not, we've seen flaws that continues to disadvantage us. There is a need to embrace a modern and better way to solve human problem, why limit the majorities and keep them at the mercy of the few. We must prioritize what needs to be done rather than what the few in control wants to be done.
Posted Using InLeo Alpha