Tornado Cash made global headlines a few years ago. The application was a coin mixer, which allowed the exchanging of coins and tokens in a private manner.
Of course, the governments of the world were up in arms. Bans started immediately with the developer targeted. Calls for the ban were driven by the fact that people could use the software for illegal activities.
When it comes to finance, trigger words are "money laundering". This is the default mantra that politician resort to when discussing these matters. Another one is "terrorists".
Hence, Tornado Cash was a haven for money launderers and terrorists.
In the United States, the Treasury Department got involved. It appears this might have been illegal.
Source
Ban of Tornado Cash Overturned
The crypto industry might have seen the turning of a corner. While this story is not over, another step was taken which could protect privacy.
In a landmark decision, the Fifth Circuit court ruled that in the U.S. it is illegal for the Treasury to impose sanctions on Tornado Cash smart contracts. This ruling supports liberty and privacy and represents a major win for the crypto community. Coinbase, a major participant in this legal battle, celebrated the decision as a turning point for individual liberties and decentralized technology.
For the moment, this is a slap on the hand of government. The court is saying this is overreach.
By removing Tornado Cash smart contracts from the list of sanctions, the court's ruling essentially permits U.S. citizens to reuse the procedure. An open-source tool for protecting privacy called Tornado Cash was sanctioned on the grounds that it made illegal activity possible.
However, the court determined that the Treasury had overreached itself because these immutable smart contracts are not considered property under the sanctions framework because they cannot be owned. Coinbase emphasized that outright banning open-source technology is not the answer, even though no one condones criminals abusing crypto protocols.
Basically the court is ruling that simply because something can be used for illegal activities does not mean it is illegal. Also, the fact that nobody owns the software puts it in another category legally.
The decision reaffirms that Congress did not intend to target a decentralized tool because of the behavior of a small percentage of users. By defending the rights of blockchain developers and users, this ruling acts as a vital check on government overreach. The court's careful review was appreciated, and Coinbase's Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal underlined the company's ongoing dedication to promoting just and open crypto laws.
We are watching a shift in legal precedent. For years we stressed the importance of decentralization. This is protection against many attack vectors, including the government. Now, the courts are starting to conclude something similar.
This, naturally, has larger implications across the crypto sphere. Many in office, such as Elizabeth Warren, has targeted crypto, stating that it is used for illegal activities.
The court stated that is not part of the consideration.
Protecting Developers
Perhaps the biggest winner in this are developers.
There is a move to make developers responsible for how their software is used. This extended to open source software.
Of course, anyone with a lick of sense knows it is impossible for anyone to guarantee that. Should Microsoft be held responsible if drug dealers use Excel to track their sales?
Things become even hairier when we move to open source. One can write a piece of software, someone hard fork it, and it become the epicenter for illegal activity.
According to many in government, the original developer should be help responsible.
While this is a step in the right direction, this is not a criminal case. It also only applies to the United States. We know the EU is getting very strict with who it is targeting, engaging in a major power struggle as technology alters society forever.
Overwhelming The System
The reason I stated that crypto doesn't need government to succeed was due to the fact that it is possible to overwhelm a system.
Basically, when playing a numbers game, the winner is clear. The numbers are against the governments.
There are more crypto developers than employees of the US government, and it isn't even close. Globally, there are millions of people coding things, a number that keeps growing.
Many are not capable of creating a Tornado Cash. However, as we will soon see, AI agents are going to multiply in a way we haven't seen. The move from millions to tens of billions will be quick.
Crypto is a global industry. Software can show up from anywhere in the world. Governments operate within set jurisdictions. This means their reach is hindered.
As an oasis opens, that provides the protection needed to push out more development. Open source only magnifies this since governments end up playing nothing more than Whack-a-Mole.
If this ruling stands, the US Treasury will be defenseless against applications such as Tornado Cash. This could be forked dozens of times, creating a swarm of coin mixers.
These will, in turn, be picked up by people in other countries. Those governments might go after them but they are back to picking up a stick against a rapidly reproducing mechanism.
Posted Using InLeo Alpha