Jobs that didn't exist fifteen years ago now employ millions globally and it's safe to say the traditional career trajectory—education, employment, advancement, retirement—has splintered into countless alternative paths, some of which offer unprecedented flexibility.
One of the characteristics that's noticeable with some of the newer types of employment is they embody the dual nature of a pecking order (clear status hierarchies) and a house of cards (inherent instability).
I'm not sure how traditional drivers who haven't been "Uber-pilled" feel about the disruption to their industry. There's no denying the massive transformation these platforms have brought.
Before Uber, becoming a taxi driver meant navigating medallion systems and/or joining established companies.
For the most part, this was a component of a regulated industry with high barriers to entry that protected incumbents and at the same time limiting opportunities for newcomers.
Similarly, artisans needed physical stores or wholesaler relationships to reach customers before the likes of Etsy and Instagram shops existed.
Democratized Opportunity
Arguably, the democratization of access represents the greatest promise of platform work and is the main contributor towards creating a more level playing field through which talent and hustle can theoretically triumph over established connections and capital.
I'm personally appreciative of the opportunity I had dipping my toes into the platform economy here and there, moments when traditional employment weren't immediately available and I needed flexible income.
Besides, equipment requirements are minimal—just a smartphone/laptop and whatever tools your trade requires.
This accessibility has created new economic lifelines. For many, platform work offers:
- Flexible hours that accommodate caregiving, education, or health limitations.
- Income without the gatekeeping of traditional hiring processes.
- The ability to monetize existing assets (a car, a spare room, creative skills)
- Entry points to entrepreneurship without substantial capital
I'm not sure if I should put a path to financial stability during economic downturn as a benefit because stability is often not part of the package at all.
Caught Between Forces
On the other side of the spectrum, you tend to grapple with questions like if you're neither truly employed nor truly independent, does this hybrid status offer the worst of both worlds rather than the best?
A worker enjoys freedom from direct management only to answer to something potentially more demanding: the algorithm.
True, no supervisor stands over your shoulder, but every move is tracked, quantified, and evaluated, which means the algorithm/overlord decides who gets visibility, who gets prioritized for opportunities, and sometimes, who gets to continue(or not) using the platform at all.
The freedom to set your schedule is theoretical when the economics push you toward certain times and patterns.
Platform workers are also told they're "entrepreneurs" and "their own bosses". Unfortunately, this is hard to experience when they cannot set their own prices, access their customer data, or establish their own terms of service.
It's basically a cognitive dissonance of feeling like a business owner while having less control than many traditional employees.
Building on Borrowed Land
Of course, the main vulnerability for platform workers is the nature of their professional foundation. Everything they build—reputation, customer base, work processes—exists on digital land they don't own.
Realizing this above-mentioned reality is like a lightbulb moment and when I connect it with other information sources I've gathered over the years, I start to really comprehend how the concept of ownership has been hijacked, so to speak, and made a façade for what is essentially a new form of digital sharecropping where we till the soil but can never own the farm.
The pecking order ensures that even the most successful platform workers remain subordinate to platform interests.
Navigating The Dilemma
Realistically, acknowledging both the opportunity and vulnerability of being in such a position is the first step toward developing strategies for sustainable success in the digital economy.
It's not all doom and gloom unless you put all your eggs in one platform basket and expect or hope the rules of the game to remain fixed in your favor.
Alternatively, there are other solutions like multi-platforming, as in spreading across multiple platforms, reducing dependence on any single algorithmic master.
In my view, a rather permanent solution after one is already familiar with building on borrowed land via traditional platforms is to transition into web3, which despite its numerous shortcomings, potentially solves the problem at a fundamental level.
True ownership of digital assets, direct peer-to-peer transactions, and community governance offer a vision of platform work where the platform itself is owned by its participants.
Thanks for reading!! Share your thoughts below on the comments.