Psychology, Philosophy & Legal (Ft History, Art & English Department)

What speech do I protect? All of it, that’s free speech, simple, I’m pro free speech - and a libertarian, while we must make measured decisions, such a comment, does invoke, a lot of discomfort to the political preferences of those of libertarian leaning.

When you speak to Libertarians, or Libertarian leaning people, and make comments like that, it upsets them, very quickly, and if, it was to continue, there is a likelihood of them not voting for you at a Ballot Box, or in the least, lowering their preferential voting as a party.

Bit of market research, on the house.

It is unfortunate, that there are no major independents, or libertarians of whom, one can reliably vote for in Australia, thus, to make an educated decision and not “waste your vote” it is quite common, for most Australians to vote for either the Labor or Liberal party, should, a genuinely viable alternative government ever present itself, I would potentially, strongly consider it, if, it was to be a proper, functional government and not, silliness.

Bit of market research to everyone else, on the house as well.

The two most powerful things you have, as a voter and active member of society, in a democracy is your vote at the ballot box, and, your wallet, you vote with your wallet every day, you only get to vote at the ballot box every so often.

Statements that involve matters that curtail free speech often, generally make Libertarians, or those with a Passion for Free Speech feel upset, and they become very passionate in their response to those things, psychologically speaking.

To people of, My Demographic & Psychographic - All Speech is Free Speech, even that of which is not to our liking.

Now do I believe people should discuss things better, yes, that is the gentlemanly thing to do, but would I make it law that they can’t speak in a certain way, never, absolutely not, that’s political correctness, which, is a tool to control speech, if you wish to study the history, of its origins at your own discretion.

Many, if the greatest speeches of politicians, historically, world leaders, generals, otherwise, or just regular businesspeople, for good, or bad, would suddenly, never have happened, nor would ever happen, Which, would subvert democracy, and its principles, in my opinion.

All Speech is Free Speech, it’s kind of the name of the concept.

And if you want to get REALLY technical, blockchain, is outside of your jurisdiction, the internet itself may be, but the publishing platform is not, it is the internet, it is everywhere and nowhere at once, on a blockchain.

As a fun aside, I speculate, anti-vaping sentiment, had little to do with the concern of “Popcorn Lung” which was the cover story that was rolled out, what I speculate it had everything to do with, was taxes, hmm Hemp vs Rope wars all over again?

Because they can’t tax it

Because then they would have to tax everything with corn syrup in it, which, is in nearly everything, so as they could not tax it, like they do cigarettes, because of the legal precedent it would set, there for, they decided to go for the banning option, just my opinion though.

Because, God forbid, smokers actually not be bankrupted by the federal government’s health agenda, with respect of course.

A time where the average working Australian, could actually afford things? perish the bloody thought ay? (That’s Sarcasm)

As for the studying, of runes, sigils, or otherwise, its imperative, to understanding history, you don’t have to take it LITERALLY, but half of your maths symbols, science symbols, all of these things, are deeply rooted in, hermetic traditions, occultism, paganism, or otherwise, they form the basis of your religions, your sciences, all of it, if you are ignorant to that fact, you are in effect, ignoring, proper, scientific history, doesn’t mean its scientific fact, but it does mean its scientific history, and its relevant to know.

Unless of course Academia now has a problem with the History department? I see no reason, at all, as to why any serious scientist, or any scientific mind, would simply be afraid of a bit of history, and a rational line of enquiry, and, a bit of art, unless we now have a problem with the Art Department and the English Department.